Part 12 of the “Court of Ruin: The William Sewell Files” series

By Michael Phillips
“Systemic injustice isn’t a glitch in the machine. It’s the machine working as designed.” — Michael Phillips
Introduction: From Exposure to Action
After 11 installments of exposing the inner workings of South Carolina’s family court system, it’s clear that William Sewell’s story isn’t just about one father. It’s about a broken, unaccountable institution. In Part 12 of the “Court of Ruin” series, we shift from telling the story to asking: what now? What can we do to dismantle a system that thrives on secrecy, favoritism, and silencing the powerless?
This article outlines real reform proposals, oversight mechanisms, and grassroots actions that can break the cycle of legal abuse—and finally deliver justice to families like William’s.
1. Independent Oversight: The Need for External Eyes
- State Judicial Oversight Commissions must be strengthened and fully independent.
- South Carolina’s Judicial Merit Selection Commission should include members of the public and civil rights watchdogs.
- Guardian ad Litem programs must be audited regularly by a neutral review board, not fellow attorneys.
2. Ending Pay-to-Play Justice
- GAL fees, attorney fees, and private evaluator costs should never be used as leverage to strip parental rights.
- Courts should be required to provide waivers or state-paid alternatives when a parent cannot afford legal representation or GAL costs.
- Mandate caps and transparency on GAL and custody evaluator billing.
3. Enforce the Turner v. Rogers Standard
- Every family court judge should be required to issue written findings and conduct formal hearings before jailing parents over civil matters.
- If a parent is unrepresented and jail is on the table, the state must provide counsel or alternative due process protections.
- Judicial training must include constitutional law and due process mandates.
4. Judicial Recusal and Conflict of Interest Reforms
- A statewide recusal protocol must be adopted and enforced—judges should not be ruling in cases involving their former colleagues or political allies.
- Recusal motions must be reviewed by an outside judge or panel.
5. Accountability for Legal Misconduct
- Bar complaints against family court attorneys should be reviewed by external ethics panels, not local associates.
- Sanctions should be mandatory for attorneys found to obstruct justice, mislead the court, or collude with opposing counsel.
- Prosecutorial discretion should not extend to ignoring perjury and fabricated evidence in family court.
6. Protections for Whistleblowers and Pro Se Litigants
- Clerks, reporters, and advocates should be protected from retaliation when they assist parents in exposing misconduct.
- Pro se litigants must have access to legal aid, templates, and training that level the playing field.
7. Federal Oversight and Civil Rights Protections
- The U.S. Department of Justice should open pattern-and-practice investigations into family courts with high rates of complaints, judicial immunity abuse, and parental alienation outcomes.
- Title IV-D and Title IV-E federal funding should be tied to due process compliance.
8. The Power of Public Exposure
- Every case like William’s adds to a growing archive of injustice.
- By documenting and publishing these stories, we create pressure. Pressure leads to oversight. Oversight leads to reform.
- Substack, Medium, podcasts, citizen press outlets—this is where we begin reclaiming truth.
Systemic Failures and William’s Case
William Sewell’s situation has only worsened as his trial approaches. He remains without legal counsel, without access to his full case file, and without the ability to issue subpoenas or prepare exhibits. A judge already ruled there would be no continuances granted, but William filed for one anyway, partly because of the extreme stress and anxiety. Now, he must prepare for a multi-day trial as a pro se litigant, all while under threat of jail for unpaid GAL fees.
His attempt to report his daughter’s injuries and alleged neglect to the Department of Social Services was met with silence and manipulation. Despite submitting photographic evidence of dog bites, bruises, and other concerning injuries, DSS took no action. One official allegedly told him, “We know Donnie. We work with him daily,” referring to Leslie’s attorney, Donnie Gamache. Gamache reportedly contacted law enforcement and DSS before William’s interviews, muting his concerns before they were even heard.
Meanwhile, character witnesses prepared to testify on William’s behalf have allegedly gone silent—some after being contacted by the opposing party. At the same time, clerks have refused to accept filings, legal aid has declined to help, and key procedural obstacles have been used to delay or derail William’s attempts at basic justice.
Policy Recommendations for South Carolina
- Establish a Family Court Accountability Office to track misconduct, judicial assignments, and fee abuse.
- Require independent court-appointed monitors in cases where GAL fees exceed $5,000.
- Enforce sanctions against clerks and judges who obstruct pro se filings or deny basic accommodations.
Federal Oversight: DOJ and Title IV-D Reform
We urge the Department of Justice to investigate South Carolina’s use of Title IV-D enforcement mechanisms that result in jailing impoverished, fit parents over administrative costs such as GAL fees. William’s case is emblematic of how financial coercion and contempt threats are misused.
Conclusion: From Victims to Voices
William Sewell was nearly destroyed by a system that made no room for justice. But his story, like so many others, is now part of a larger movement. Family courts have long operated in the shadows. It’s time we shine a light, name the players, and change the rules.
If you’re reading this, you’re part of the solution.
This is Part 12 in our ongoing series, “Court of Ruin: The William Sewell Files.”
Contact mikethunderphillips@gmail.com to join the movement or share your story.
#CourtOfRuin #RebuiltJustice
All claims in this article are based on the personal experiences and allegations made by William H. Sewell. This article includes opinions and reporting based on interviews, court documents, and publicly available information. Donnie Gamache and any other named parties are presumed innocent of any wrongdoing unless proven otherwise.
