Conflict

Conflict

  • Wars & Armed Conflicts
  • Ceasefires & Peace Talks
  • Military Operations
  • Security Flashpoints

A Necessary Strike—But Not a Strategy: What the U.S. Airstrikes in Nigeria Mean

U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State–linked militants in northwestern Nigeria mark a sharp escalation in America’s counterterrorism posture in West Africa. While the strikes may disrupt jihadist operations in the short term, experts warn that airpower alone cannot resolve the deeper governance failures and regional instability fueling the Sahel’s growing terror threat.

U.S. Escalates Caribbean “Quarantine” on Venezuelan Oil Tankers as Trump Tightens Sanctions Enforcement

The Trump administration has escalated sanctions enforcement in the Caribbean, deploying thousands of U.S. troops, warships, and aircraft to interdict oil tankers linked to Venezuela’s regime. Framed as a maritime “quarantine,” the operation marks the most aggressive U.S. naval posture in the region in decades—and a clear signal that sanctions will now be enforced, not…

Russia–Ukraine Peace Talks Advance—But a Deal Remains Unlikely

A newly unveiled U.S.-Ukrainian peace framework has intensified diplomacy to end the Russia–Ukraine war, but Moscow’s core demands remain unchanged. Despite heavy U.S. involvement and revised concessions, analysts say a comprehensive agreement is unlikely in the near term, with talks serving more to manage the conflict than resolve it.

Trump’s Greenland Envoy Sparks Diplomatic Clash as Arctic Security Stakes Rise

Diplomatic tensions have escalated between the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland following Trump’s appointment of Governor Jeff Landry as a special envoy to Greenland, reviving debates over Arctic security and sovereignty. Denmark and Greenland firmly rejected annexation notions, emphasizing their right to self-determination amid concerns about geopolitical competition with Russia and China.

U.S. Narco-Boat Strikes Spark Debate Over Security, Sovereignty, and Transparency

The Trump administration’s expanding air campaign against suspected drug-trafficking vessels in international waters has reignited debate over national security, sovereignty, and the rule of law. Supporters frame the strikes as a necessary deterrent against transnational cartels, while critics warn that a lack of transparency and mounting civilian claims risk regional instability and legal overreach.

Operation Hawkeye Strike: U.S. and Jordanian Forces Hit ISIS Hard in Syria

U.S. and Jordanian forces launched a sweeping overnight assault on ISIS positions in Syria, striking more than 70 targets with over 100 precision-guided munitions in what officials called one of the largest counterterrorism operations in recent years. The strikes, a direct response to the deadly December 13 ambush that killed two American soldiers and a…

U.S. Military Kills Eight in Eastern Pacific Strikes as ‘Narco-Terror’ Campaign Expands

The U.S. military has confirmed the deaths of eight people after airstrikes destroyed three suspected drug-trafficking vessels in international waters of the eastern Pacific, marking the latest escalation in the Trump administration’s campaign to treat cartels as terrorist threats. The operation highlights a dramatic shift from traditional interdiction to lethal force—raising sharp questions about legality,…

U.S. Troops Killed in ISIS-Linked Ambush in Syria, Raising Questions About Partner Vetting and Regional Control

Three Americans were killed in an ISIS-linked ambush in Palmyra, Syria, during a joint U.S.-Syrian counterterrorism operation, marking the first U.S. combat deaths in the country since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime. The attack—carried out by a gunman later identified as a member of Syria’s own security forces—has raised serious questions about partner vetting,…

After the Uniform: It’s Time to Count the Days That Really Matter

The article highlights the emotional turmoil faced by veteran parents dealing with family court injustices, emphasizing their grief over separation from children. It advocates for specific policy reforms, including prioritizing parenting time for veterans, establishing oversight in family court decisions, and tracking parental separation days to better support military families and acknowledge their struggles.

The New Warlords: How Private Corporations Replaced Governments in the Name of Freedom

The post discusses the rise of corporate power following the fall of the Berlin Wall, highlighting the outsourcing of government functions to private companies in areas like military operations, prisons, and intelligence. It argues that this shift has led to a system prioritizing profit over public welfare, fostering neo-feudalism and diminishing democratic oversight.

Still No Justice: How the Military’s Family Advocacy Program Becomes a Weapon Against Its Own

The military’s treatment of servicemembers facing false allegations reveals a troubling parallel to family court, which can lead to significant, often irreversible consequences. Investigations by the Family Advocacy Program, lacking due process, can result in punitive actions without evidence. This damaging system undermines national security and calls for urgent reform and accountability.

The Silent Coup of the 1990s: How Privatization, ADR, and Drug Cartels Rewired American Power

The 1990s, often viewed as a prosperous decade, actually concealed significant systemic corruption characterized by privatization of justice and prisons, alongside the emergence of corporate cartels. These changes, fueled by political interests and military-industrial complex dynamics, blurred the lines between government, corporations, and crime, undermining democracy and public accountability.

No One Is Safe: How Family Court Punishes Our Heroes

Veterans and first responders, who sacrifice for our safety, face unjust treatment in family court. Their service is misinterpreted as disqualification from parenthood, leading to custody loss. The system is biased, often favoring those who remain behind. Reform is essential to ensure justice protects rather than punishes those who serve.